.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

fran drescher husband gay

images Fran Drescher on gay ex fran drescher husband gay. starring Fran Drescher.
  • starring Fran Drescher.



  • gceverywhere
    09-26 10:12 AM
    Hermione,

    How confident are you to call them "Ignorant".... It could be very planned and calculative agenda. Writer writes in CNN. Never ever be ignorant about their tactful agenda, capacity and wilful application of the polity.

    I belive, IV MUST talk to CNN and force them to accept the "error" in that article publicly by publishing at earliest.

    Whether it was ignorance or a planned move, I agree with you that IV must talk to CNN and ask them to re-publish that article with the correct information.





    wallpaper starring Fran Drescher. fran drescher husband gay. Actress Fran Drescher gestures
  • Actress Fran Drescher gestures



  • amsgc
    07-04 07:53 PM
    Ramba - Excellent post!

    The lawsuit will bring to light some irregularities, and will probably encourage USCIS to be more responsible.
    But the way out of our misery is still congressional intervention - increase in visa numbers, skill bill, or additional provisions for people with an approved immigrant petition.





    fran drescher husband gay. From cancer to a gay husband,
  • From cancer to a gay husband,



  • gcisadawg
    03-09 06:40 PM
    I am tired of words "Something is Cooking". All I care now is cooked food - whatever is cooking.

    u bet! :D





    2011 Actress Fran Drescher gestures fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher: My gay
  • Fran Drescher: My gay



  • logiclife
    12-20 08:31 PM
    On a second thought, If I interpret it correctly...

    the alien, subsequent to such lawful admission has not, for an aggregate period exceeding 180 days�
    (A) failed to maintain, continuously, a lawful status;
    (B) engaged in unauthorized employment; or
    (C) otherwise violated the terms and conditions of the alien�s admission.


    I exceeded 180 days and was out of status, but the law says that you shouldn't exceed 180 days :eek:

    yes, but that happened prior to your last admission in USA and prior to your filing of 485.

    Make sure that it doesnt happen now. What happened before your last entry into USA and before 485 filing is like what happened in Vegas.

    Relax my friend, if you still cant find solace, then surely talk to a lawyer. I always do that when in doubt because frankly, there is a reason why professinals exist.

    Also, search "245(k) immigration" in google and read lawyer's interpretations of section 245(k), you will understand what I am saying.



    more...


    fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher Talks New TV
  • Fran Drescher Talks New TV



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue





    fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher. Rate It:
  • Fran Drescher. Rate It:



  • thomachan72
    07-29 02:50 PM
    Great post.

    Thanks abracadabra for agreeing to the point. It is really funny isn't it, when you notice people fighting over God's? Just the thought of fighting to support your God shows that you really dont belive in his/her strength or you dont really know what God is!! If thats the case, how would that power qualify to be GOD?? Whether it is in Inda/pakisthan/middle east/africa, wherever people fight to save their God/gods are just fighting to avoid confronting their own insecurity:-) What is the difference between me getting insulted on seeing Ganeshas picture on a beer bottle or Jesus's picture on the toilet seat and a circle with two dots as eyes on a person's BUTT, which he claims to represent ME (thomas)? Ofcourse I know that the circle with 2 dotts on his BUTT doesn't represent me so is the same about Ganesha / Jesus. Who has seen these folks?? The big truth is NOBODY!! EVER!! Imagine how would I look if I stood around crying like a baby, when the guy walks around with his BUTT exposed showing the circle with two dotts claiming that it acurately represents me?? Ganesha, Jesus, Allah and Krishna are all laughing. Laughing not at the person who shows off as insulting them, but actually (ironically) at us who stand around crying about that. Belive me this is true!! we had a conference call last night and all three of them were laughing :D:D:D



    more...


    fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher talks being
  • Fran Drescher talks being



  • uma001
    03-09 09:44 PM
    HAHAAHA, Yu guys are still dreaming. No more egreen cards for H1Bs doesnt matter what stage you are in. You will get queries like 'when there are so many americans without jobs, why do you need immigrants?' can any company wants to respond to this query?
    Already several companies (especially american companies)received this type of audit, And they stopped filing labor and I140.Dont know what type of new audits come at 485 stage.I lost hopes of green card. I have 3.6 years left on H1. I will save whatever I can n go back to india, open a groceyr store, run it on no profit no loss purpose.





    2010 From cancer to a gay husband, fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher on gay ex
  • Fran Drescher on gay ex



  • nixstor
    07-05 11:52 AM
    People are voting, but do not want to voice their opinion on why this should be a paid site or not. Did I say anything wrong about paid subscriptions? Those who are voting "NO", Can you enlighten me why a wesbite that we hang on to every day for atleast one hour should be FREE? Why should so much of energy go waste all the time running funding drives? Why does a Murthy or Rajiv's 15 min consultation has to be 225USD and IV's community knowledge leveraged for not even peanuts?



    more...


    fran drescher husband gay. that her husband is gay.
  • that her husband is gay.



  • neelu
    12-11 05:09 PM
    USCIS cannot do anything on the matter. INA is clear on the AOS conditions, one of which is "An immigrant visa is IMMEDIATELY available at time of filing for adjustment of status" (INA 245, 8 USC 1225)

    INA should be changed which should be done through a legislative process, not through any rule making.


    As I understand the above, the law only says when you can file for AOS (to change which a legislative process is required).

    The above still does not throw any more light on the technicality which disallows concurrent filing. Does it?

    Was concurrent processing facility removed through a congressional action (legislation)? If not, why is it required to reinstate it?

    Is this a valid argument? If it is, then this particular request should be directed towards a body such as USCIS, etc and not the congress.

    Any comments?





    hair Fran Drescher: My gay fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher#39;s role in the
  • Fran Drescher#39;s role in the



  • StarSun
    02-18 11:04 AM
    Sukhwinder is coordinating the efforts on carpool and hosting options.
    Members who wish to carpool please post on the thread as well as send an email to Sukhwinder - 2011carpool@gmail.com

    Vinay is coordinating the efforts on airmiles, people wishing to donate air miles or request help for using the air miles, please PM vin13.

    Thank you.



    more...


    fran drescher husband gay. In the case of actress Fran
  • In the case of actress Fran



  • zen
    04-07 10:09 AM
    it is good to hear from Pappu that IV is ready to take up this issue ...but till someone comes foward ..can IV focus on other issues like recapture, removal of country limits etc (there is no shortage of issues where focus is needed)
    ------------------
    no comments from anyone regarding the above ?





    hot Fran Drescher Talks New TV fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher
  • Fran Drescher



  • andycool
    09-10 02:33 PM
    What are the hopes for EB3-I?
    ZERO


    Till we spend our time in predictions and tracking, till the time we stop jumping the gun in calling for lawsuits, till the time we stop interpreting the INA to find a smoking gun, till the time we stop calling names for USCIS and DOS, till the time we stop blaming 245(i), till the time we stop engaging in eb2 v/s eb3 fight, till the time we stop fighting with each other over irrelevant things, till the time we stop creating these stupid polls, till the time we stop engaging in "number crunching" whatever that means, until that time there is ZERO hope for Eb3-I. Once we stop wasting our time on all these irrelevant things, we will then start spending our time on more meaningful things like speaking with the members of Congress. Then, and only then, there will be a chance of anything good happening for EB3-I.


    Port to EB-2 ......



    more...


    house Fran Drescher didn#39;t have to fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher
  • Fran Drescher



  • bazuka6
    11-21 11:02 PM
    That's probably the path most people with (EB3 2003 onwards/EB2 2004 onwards) will take from now on. The only hurdle is there is no clarity about the law regarding H1B extensions granted on an approved I-140. Most people have run out of H1B and will have to change jobs on the extensions. I hope USCIS issues a clear guidance on this issue. Also you might not have to let go of the priority date if your company is kind enough.

    There is clear guidance in that H1-B petitioner seeking extension does not have to be the same employer that had filed (and approved) the I-140. Once you have an approved 140, anyone can extend your H1 for 3 years





    tattoo Fran Drescher. Rate It: fran drescher husband gay. starring Fran Drescher
  • starring Fran Drescher



  • Lasantha
    07-29 01:04 PM
    I would definitely drink this beer if I can get my hands on it. Hopefully it will give me some brains! :D



    more...


    pictures Fran Drescher talks being fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher: My ex-husband
  • Fran Drescher: My ex-husband



  • amitjoey
    01-18 11:51 AM
    Need 898 members with minimum of $20 monthly recurring.
    If you set yourself up for monthly contribution please deduct a number from 898





    dresses Fran Drescher fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher Blessed Gay Ex-
  • Fran Drescher Blessed Gay Ex-



  • sroyc
    10-20 02:26 PM
    Since we cannot vote and influence the outcome of the presidential elections in any way, let's focus on what we can influence - legislation related to EB immigration.

    I don't think either Obama or McCain will reject relief for EB immigrants stuck in the backlog. The challenge for us is (and has always been) getting such a bill through the House and the Senate. Let's try to figure out how we can do that instead of bickering over something we don't have any control over.



    more...


    makeup that her husband is gay. fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher didn#39;t have to
  • Fran Drescher didn#39;t have to



  • lifestrikes
    02-14 02:29 PM
    Day Off (April 4, 5) - Check
    Accommodation - Check


    I'm driving to DC from Cary, North Carolina on Saturday. Will attend Training on Sunday and both Advocacy Days.





    girlfriend starring Fran Drescher fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher is busy doing
  • Fran Drescher is busy doing



  • peer123
    07-13 09:20 AM
    Agree, she is just trying to cash on the momentum and probalby later claim credit if favorable changes are made. But , it should not bother us as it only going to help us and not hurt us.

    I agree with you,... Lets accept it. Nothing is FREE in this world...

    There is something called corporate alignment in every aspect of the business. She doing it - if it helps her as well as us. So be it.

    we should be able to combine all forces and go at it....





    hairstyles In the case of actress Fran fran drescher husband gay. Fran Drescher: My Ex-Husband
  • Fran Drescher: My Ex-Husband



  • javadeveloper
    12-11 11:52 AM
    All of us (people on L-1, F-1, J-1, H1, B1, K1 and their derivatives....) went to US consulate to request for VISA. US consulate never came to your door with a VISA.

    Everyone goes to Bank and do transactions , that doesn't mean that we only need Bank and Bank doesn't need us and our deposits.





    feedfront
    09-23 12:24 PM
    Congrats Dude.. :)

    Enjoy the freedom and keep supporting the immigration reform





    meimmi
    03-09 04:45 PM
    In my husband's case we dont have that much time.

    Here what our plan is:-
    1. Self file G-28.
    2. Follow up with an infopass appt. with in a month.

    Rest god willing. What ever is going to happen will happen. No one can stop it from happening.

    Hi, Did you send the AC21 letter yourself? Can you please let us know the format of the letter and supporting documents you sent? Also, please share the format of G-28 explanation. How was your experience so far? Did you receive any confirmation back from USCIS? Thanks.